Colin Redfern
Bahamianseashells.com, Inc.
Some comments on the
Compendium of Brazilian Sea Shells by Eliézer Rios (2009)
On page viii of the “Compendium of Brazilian Sea Shells” Prof. Rios acknowledges several people who sent him malacological photographs, including “Colin Redfern (Nudibranks)” [sic].
Apparently something has been lost in the translation, as I never sent any photographs. In fact I had no communication with Prof. Rios. No request to reproduce photos from Bahamian Seashells was received, so naturally none was granted. Such permission would have been happily granted if sought, but would have been accompanied by several requests.
The first request would have been that no black-and-white photos from Bahamian Seashells should be artificially colored. For example, this black-and-white photo of Dendostrea frons (fig. 859 in Bahamian Seashells) has been reproduced in the Compendium in an interesting shade of violet:
Note also that the worm shell attached to the lower valve has disappeared - (see
next request).
My second request would have been that no photographs from Bahamian Seashells should
be subjected to cosmetic “improvements”. For example, this photo of Megalomphalus
troudei with chipped outer lip (fig. 105A in Bahamian Seashells) has been reproduced
(unattributed) in the Compendium with a regenerated lip:

The range of the above species, illustrated with a shell from Abaco, Bahamas, is given as Martinique and Brazil - (see next request).
My next request would have been that photos from Bahamian Seashells of species occurring in the Bahamas should not be used (without explanation) to illustrate different species that occur in Brazil. For example, a ventral photo of Trapania dalva (fig. 714 in Bahamian Seashells) is used to illustrate Trapania maringa in the Compendium, and a photo of Siraius kyolis (fig. 722) is used to illustrate Siraius ilo.
My fourth request would have been that no photos of living specimens from Bahamian Seashells should have the visible soft parts removed in an apparent attempt to make it appear that the shell is empty. This is especially misleading when pigmented soft parts are visible through a white shell. For example, a photo of living Melanella hypsela (fig. 344C in Bahamian Seashells) has been reproduced in the Compendium sans soft parts. This entailed removing the eyes, which were visible through the shell. However, the reddish lines on the animal’s head remain, giving the impression that they are part of the shell’s (non-existent) coloration.
235 Caecum lineicinctum
272 Megalomphalus troudei
275 Megalomphalus oxychone
470 Melanella hypsela
968 Odostomia somersi
1087 Aglaja unsa
1111 Ercolania fuscata
1112 Costasiella ocellifera
1113 Costasiella nonatoi
1115 Hermaea coirala
1123 Elysia tuca
1124 Bosellia mimetica
1130 Aplysia parvula
1132 Petalifera petalifera
1133 Phyllaplysia engeli
1176 Okenia zoohotryon [sic]
1177 Okenia impexa
1178 Trapania maringa
1180 Polycera odhneri
1199 Siraius ilo
1202 Discodoris evelinae
1215 Dendrodoris krebsi [sic]
1221 Lomanotus phiops
1222 Scyllaea pelagica
1223 Hancockia ryrca
1225 Doto caramella
1227 Doto pita
1228 Doto uva
1232 Janolus comis
1235 Flabellina marcusorum
1237 Eubranchus coniclus
1243 Cuthona tina
1251 Favorinus auritulus
1252 Dondice occidentalis
1254 Nanuca sebastiani
1397 Lopha frons
1454 Basterotia elliptica
1500 Tellina gouldii
Page 365 Apertural detail of Pyramidella crenulata
My final request would have been by far the most important. Thirty-nine photos from Bahamian Seashells have been reproduced in the Compendium. The photographer is identified in the text for twenty-three of those photos, but nowhere is it indicated that the photographed specimens were collected in Abaco, Bahamas, more than 3000 miles away from Brazil. To give only one example, a photo of Nanuca sebastiani (fig. 753 in Bahamian Seashells) is used in the Compendium to illustrate that species from Brazil, regardless of the fact that the appearance of that animal varies considerably from the northern to southern limits of its range. Anybody using the Compendium for research would be justified in thinking that the published figure represents the appearance of that species in Brazil. My final request would therefore have been that the origin of all figured specimens collected from the Bahamas should be clearly indicated.
Perhaps the following list will be useful to future researchers. The species names are as they appear in the Compendium - (for example Flabellina marcusorum is listed, although it is illustrated by a photo of Flabellina dana Millen & Hamann, 2006). Each of the following species is illustrated by a specimen collected from Abaco, Bahamas.